Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Why the iPad Will Change the World


2010
04.02

It took a bit of thinking to “get” the iPad, and a bit of putting the pieces together. For example:

bluetooth = remote keyboard in Appletech. Add 10 points.

Keyboard + charger already made = Use it as a sort of desktop at home… another 10 points.

iPad with Keyboard

Bluetooth Keyboard + charging base = desktop docking for home use

Then came the big understanding, the epiphany, as I pondered why the HELL they would make two versions, why anyone would want one that wasn’t connected to the ‘Net when away from your router… and why the HELL they got in bed with AT&T again.  But I trusted Apple to have a very good reason for it, so it was up to me to ponder it out.  The results:

It’s NOT Sleeping With The Enemy Part Deux.  It’s actually the other way around.  For those who want it (and a true satellite GPS) they negotiated the no-contract $30 a month UNLIMITED deal.  That’s sweet for us.  But they didnt’ marry AT&T, because T-mobile & Verizon both have pocket routers to go with their 3G service.  Still lost?  Ya get the router service, and then your iPad, iPod, iBook, i-ay-i-ay-ay, and even your friend’s Windoze machine ALL get the ‘Net, even if you’re at the beach or driving down the road in your car.  Bloody brilliant! (more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Android: End the Fragmentation?


2010
03.16

PREFACE: A techie wrote that Android should end the fragmentation, noting the myriad differences and discrepancies between their first versions and the current one, just a bit over a year later.   He’s right, but perhaps for different reasons than he scribed.

It’s bad enough that Droid E. isn’t half the phone that the Motorola is.  That there are generational differences is to be expected, but still tedious.  While those who already have an Android OS phone may (or may not) keep abreast of the differences, that doesn’t mean everyone does.

For the consumer, it’s a mismosh hodgepodge mess that is easier avoided than delved into… and that translates to loss of sales… and that translates to less interest in developing apps (or anything else) for your toys.

Apple’s control was a good example.  Far from Draconian, it simply required consistency; A simple and consistent Command-Q beats Alt-F4 every time.  Ditto the Command-W to close a window but not the entire application.  It has served them and their customers well for decades.  The hodgepodge mismatch that Android is already experiencing demonstrates the difficulties encountered with a lack of standards.

I like the Droid OS a lot, and the speed of the processor is also appealing.  Yet after investigating, I declined to buy into getting a Motorola Droid from Verizon.  Why?  It’s only $30 more a month, for starters.  What do I get for $30 a month? Mapping.  Great.  So I buy a Garmin for the car, it does a better job with a bigger screen, and has no monthly fees.  Net savings: $360+tax a year, plus $200 for the initial purchase.  With that money, I’ll buy myself an iPad* that I can count on to work and serve me well, whether I use N-speed wifi or the pre-arranged no-contract AT&T service that the Draconian tyrants at Apple negotiated for us.

Wake up and smell the money, Android, before you end up another cult device of the past.

* No, the iPad is not a phone, but it’s a lot better at providing all the things that count for a Smartphone, and I can use Skype or Google voice with my bluetooth headset and still make calls.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

What if they made an OS and nobody came?


2009
10.23

Apple has Snow Leopard.  Microsoft has Windows 7 (or was that the final release of Vista?)  Apple has new laptops.  PCs have new netbooks.  They also have desktops utilizing Atom and rehashing — wait for it — Windows XP.  Yep, the OS that Microsoft supposedly wasn’t going to sell anymore is now out and running on Netbooks and desktop all-in-one (steal from Apple much?) units that cost between $300 and $400, including the OS.  Much ado about nothing.

What was really wrong with Leopard?  Sure, Snow Leopard has some improvements… but that’s USUALLY an update, when you fix things that should have been right the first time.  Ditto Microsoft’s Windows 7.  All I can say (well, write,) is “it’s about time!”  But why are we being expected to pay for them to get the stuff we bought working right?  Shouldn’t it have worked right in the first place?

Then there’s the myriad licenses I’ve paid Microsoft for.  10 laptops in the past 10 years, each of them with a license for Windows.  Where do those licenses go when the laptop is buried?  Shouldn’t they go onto the new computer?  After all, they keep insisting we’re buying the abstract license, not the media it is on, right?

So what was SO wrong with the previous OS that it had to be replaced… and if it was so bad, Microsoft, then why are you rehashing it — two generations back, now — in the very latest of machines?

Maybe it’s time — No, it’s long PAST time — that we wised up, stopped buying what they tell us is the Latest and Greatest.  Spending over $100 more to have those promises of something new just doesn’t make sense.  If we’re that bored, lets spend that money on something that actually IS new.  It makes both dollars and sense to keep on using what already works.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Grey Elephant Hiding In the Smart Phone


2009
10.07

Even in the 3Gs release, the iPhone still does it.  So does the MyTouch, and the new Motorola Cliq made the same mistake as the others.  What is that?  They still only operate wifi under b and g standard.  Disappointingly slow?  That’s the tip of the problem. (more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)