Posts Tagged ‘liberty’

The Daily Price Of Freedom


2009
12.22

Just last week I posted on the notion that the price of Liberty is affording that same inalienable right to others around you.  This week, I got to experience personal tyranny in a way that I haven’t seen in a few years.  Someone who owns a domain and forum pushing his weight around, banning people for disagreeing with him, or objecting to his questionable business tactics.  It became a lesson in the concept of Public.  If he owns a place where people are invited to gather and talk, share ideas, etc., does he have the ethical right to expel them from that online society if he doesn’t like the person?

At first glance, it may seem like a “My house, my rules” situation.  On further inspection, though, one finds that it isn’t his house.  By inviting the general public into the forum, he made it a public place.  As such, speech which poses no threat or actual libel should be free.  That you don’t LIKE someone isn’t cause to ban that person.  If he starts trashing you there on your own forum, that may be seen as tacky, but even then, the libertarian option is that the opposing view gets a voice as well; you can disagree with him and present your side, but it’s still not okay to just toss someone out for disagreeing or thinking poorly of you. (more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

The High Price of Liberty


2009
12.17

These days, it seems everyone expects instant gratification, perceives entitlements that they haven’t earned or inherited, don’t deserve.  That’s one side of the coin.  On the other side (still the same coin,) there are those who claim right to control the behaviors of others, at the expense of their civil liberties.  Unwarranted censorship is performed by moderators of online forums — people telling other people what they may or may not say, and how they may and may not express those sentiments.  This is done under the guise of representing the best interest of the members as a whole, but most often is simply the result of a control freak being put in charge of that forum.  Put it in the context of a corporeal situation.  Who would tolerate someone asserting himself so deeply in a conversation between two other people? (more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)