Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

The Despicable Side of Health Care Reform


2010
03.22

Watching the House debate before their vote yesterday evening was downright embarrassing.  These are our leaders, these sophists, parading around their lies, just so they can “win”?  All of that flag-waving rhetoric, and not a bit of truth or transparency to any of it?  How many times did the Chair have to demand order in the House?  How many times did the Republicans tell outright lies about the healthcare reform bill?  The claims that the bill promoted Abortion are absurd at best.  The implication that the President might go back on his word, rescind the executive order, is downright insulting.

The GOP reminded me of Shakespeare.  No, not by any poetry.  I have been mindful of his line, “Methinks the lady doth protesteth overmuch,” since they started telling the Democrats what was best for them, “warning” them not to pass the bill, lest they be ousted.  Since when do the Republicans NOT want the Dems to be ousted?  What were they really afraid of?  That the Democrats would finally do what they never got around to caring enough about to do themselves?  That the Obama administration might be remembered as the one that brought health care to everyone, while their last reign brought death and national debt to millions?

I don’t ride either party’s beast of burden.  I just call ‘em like I see ‘em.  Once again, the Republicans seem to be all sour grapes.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

What Change Looks Like (Health Care Reform)


2010
03.22

In his address after the Democrats passed the Health Care Reform Act of 2010, President Obama said “This is what Change looks like.”   Yep, it is.  Spot on.  What form will that change take?  As always, it’s entirely up to us.  As he said in his inaugural address, the government can help us, but it’s still up to us to actually do it, to make the changes.  Passing the bill was, as the Majority Whip said, “one gigantic step toward a more perfect Union.”   But it’s still just a step.  Everyone in Congress and the Oval Office knew that the bill wasn’t comprehensive, that it doesn’t solve all the problems.  Many of those problems aren’t for the government to solve in the first place.

The opponents seem to be stuck on a few issues.  Let’s take a look at them:

1) I don’t want to be forced to buy insurance against my will. I had to laugh at that one — repeatedly.  I don’t want to pay for car insurance either, especially when I haven’t had a ticket or accident in over a decade.  Nevertheless, it is part of being a citizen to have to be responsible for whatever costs I may incur.  Tell me, how is it not our job to be responsible for the costs of our own health care?  If not, whose body is it?   Nobody WANTS to pay for ANYthing.  But then there’s reality.  In the real world, you could become sick or be injured.  It could be major, catastrophic, life-threatening… and We The People shouldn’t be stuck paying the bill because you don’t THINK you need it, or you don’t WANT to pay for it.  It’s really quite fair, (if not biased in favor of youth,) the way insurance premiums are calculated.  A 20 year old pays far less for health insurance than a 50 year old.  The presumption is that they’ll be healthy for a goodly while longer, while the insurance carriers presume I will cost them money.  (I could get on a rant about how, by 50, I’ve learned to avoid accident and injury, but why bother?)  Bottom line is that you should have to pay in.   And it should start yesterday.

2) It forces the Federal government to fund abortions that I don’t believe in. First off, it doesn’t. Women choose to have an abortion or not to.  Neither the government nor a health care program is going to make you have an abortion against your choice.  More importantly, by squashing that, the anti-abortionists are effectively cramming THEIR beliefs down everyone else’s throats.  But they’re not the ones who will have to postpone their lives for the next 18+ years to have and raise a child.  So stop forcing other people to do things your way.  If you don’t want them to have an abortion, change their minds (respectfully.)  A policy doesn’t choose to have an abortion.

3) It’s too expensive. Even if you don’t trust the CBO, it’s not “too expensive.”  It is what it is, and it will cost what it will cost.  Health isn’t a luxury.  Health care isn’t optional.  Certainly, we should all do what we can to reduce costs, and there are many things that can yet be done.  While there is no tort reform, though, I really don’t want to hear about how it’s too expensive.

4) It’s socialism; it will take my coverage away from me. More of that baseless fear-instilling rhetoric from the GOP.  It won’t take away anyone’s coverage, nor his/her choices.  It’s NOT socialized medicine, even if there were a public option.  Please, have a clue what you’re talking about.  The stakes are certainly high enough for you to do your research without listening to every dull-witted pundit with an axe to grind.  At least use some common sense.

In the days, weeks, months and years to come, we’ll find out what’s really in those 2309 pages.  Meanwhile, I’ve got to trust the Congress we elected.  More than half of them agreed that this was a step in the right direction.  It’s a good start.  Let’s keep it up, keep it going, and turn this country’s health care system into something stellar, exemplary.  In this most wealthy nation, no one should do without or suffer any illness or injury without treatment.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Impeach the President Over ObamaCare?


2010
03.19

When I saw the headline, “Impeach The President” in the Opinions section of the Washington Times online, I thought it was going to be sarcastic hyperbole.  Reading the article itself was a lesson in the ability of published people to be ignorant, and the comments that followed the “opinion” were even more fanatically inane.  This one was especially laughable:

el2007: America needs three good Generals sworn to uphold the Constitution to lead a military coup, impose martial law and hold national elections.

Yep, that’s what we need.  A military coupe, fascist control of our government, until they decide to give us our country back by election.  Go ahead, let me know how that works for you,  El2007.  So far, Guinea has endured 2 dictators over several decades that way, and they’re still trying to get someone elected from the last coupe.   But let’s move on beyond the laugh factory and take a fair and serious look at it all.

First off, the label “Obamacare” is demonstration of a bias.  Why wasn’t it Bushwars?  Because the GOP’s mouthpieces truly love to ridicule positions other than their own.  Every ill-intended nickname in my recollection has come from that group.  (For the record, I’m neither Liberal nor Conservative, Democrat nor Republican.  I prefer to think and decide for myself.)  Obama simply promised to bring people the health insurance they need.  And he’s correct, people have needed relief from the insurance company’s ways of doing things for a very long time, now.  But he didn’t devise the plan.  Over 500 of our elected officials are behind the 2309 pages of junk about to be decided in the House.  There are many things to complain about, from the lack of time (72 hours just isn’t long enough to read that thing, let alone analyze it.  We’re talking 32 pages an hour, and that’s if you didn’t sleep or eat or shower,) to the means of passing it being proposed by the Speaker of the House.  But blaming Obama for trying to drum up support for the health care bill is about like blaming him for the existence of taxes.  He didn’t make the problem OR the solution being posed.  He’s just pushing us to do SOMETHING, rather than nothing.  What he HAS insisted on was all good.  He insisted that it be paid for, not just a bottomless pit or a blank check.  How terrible of him to suggest such a thing?  So tell me, pundit types: Why do you blame him and the Senate and House mouthpieces, when it took more than 500 representatives to come to this point?

There are many issues with the current health care reform bill.  I am sorry to admit that I am not convinced that it will do the job.  It lacks Tort Reform, so there’s no end to the need for Defensive Medicine, and that is the single biggest cost we face, when all aspects are considered.  The lack of Public OPTION bothers me as well, because I don’t see how the insurance companies will be kept from raping us on the rates while blaming the currently uninsured for the increases.  That it’s being rushed through by Pelosi bothers me, too.  That the 500+ in Congress couldn’t come up with anything better than the House and Senate bills is pathetic.  But none of that has anything to do with Obama.

Then there’s the whole Socialist angle.  Just about every Obama basher with a keyboard is labeling him a Communist, a Socialist or a Muslim (though he’s clearly Christian and decidedly affluent.)  Let me enlighten a few of you: Socialism is not Communism.  Our roads and highways are a socialist policy.  Our bridges are a socialist policy.  Even our airports, trains and bus systems are socialist, as are our groceries, dairies, and just about every other part of our society.  We are social creatures.  Capitalism is wonderful for the Haves, but even they have need of the “socialist” services.  Even through my libertarian leanings, I’m able to recognize that travel would become untenable if we were to rely upon Capitalism to provide us with streets and highways.  Imagine if EMS were a strictly private enterprise.  The ambulance arrives, you’re in cardiac arrest, and they’re qualifying you to make sure you can afford the $6000 they’re going to charge for the 5 mile ride, instead of administering CPR.  No thanks.  Anyone who thinks things through will admit they prefer our Socialist version of life to the Rugged Individualist suicide that a truly anti-socialist society (talk about an oxymoron) would be in practice.  So, for the love of whatever it is you believe in or cherish, lay off the dull-witted labels!

Should we impeach the President?  For what?  The last President violated the Constitution itself, lied to the American people to get us into wars that cost trillions of dollars, killed hundreds of thousands of people (including many thousands of our own,) and benefited the Vice-President and their cronies.  Gas prices were huge and choking (while he and his family owned 12% of Exxon,) yet the Democrats never got anywhere past committee with the  Articles of Impeachment justly filed by Dennis Kucinich.  When Bill Clinton lied about something that no one with any decency would have asked him, the GOP tried to impeach him for it.   Starting to see a pattern?  The GOP is a bunch of whining crybabies.  They call foul whenever they don’t get their way.  They try to impeach, even the day after the People re-elect Clinton into a second term.   It comes as no shock or surprise that some of them drag up impeachment of this President as well, even though he hasn’t done anything unlawful.

Even if the support were there in Congress, it would be ridiculous to impeach President Obama.  Compared to both of the Bushes and Clinton, Obama is a Constitutional saint!  If you’re upset about the healthcare “reform” legislation (or lack thereof,) take that up with Congress.  That doesn’t necessarily mean voting them out and letting the chips fall where they may.  It DOES mean getting involved in the process.  When all is said and done, Don Henley was entirely correct when he penned “We get the government we deserve.”

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

To The Gripers (Working Together)


2009
01.08

Lately it seems like bored, nothing-better-to-do housewives and Mister-Moms have taken to the Internet, and are looking to vent their personal frustrations by bashing Barak Obama — before the man has even taken office. Would that people had been as quick and eager to launch assault against George W. Bush. There are some ideas that all of you, Gripers and Neutrals and Supporters alike, need to consider:

(more…)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)